it is at some point past two in the morning, and I’m attempting to make similar units of torsos, minds, and arms that fit collectively to create impossible system. I’ve answered a phone call for forms for a conference on gamification and, since one of the proposed topic markets was “personal affairs,” I’m design a vaguely rummy-like cards online game about online dating sites. (The convention motivates experimental formats.)

My online game is called “OkMatch!” which besides puns two common online-dating sites—OkCupid! and Match.com—but also captures lots of people’s ambivalence toward the prospects they come across on these websites: “okay” suits (if they’re fortunate). Into the video game, players you will need to put together an entire “partner” by acquiring 11 body-part notes, each allocated a profile trait (height, studies level, zodiac indication, etc.) with point principles. It’s more straightforward to bring, say, a +1 best leg than a +5 one, thus players must decide whether to wait or “settle” the reduced benefits cards they currently have. The online game ends up whenever one member finishes somebody (and so gets a 15-point incentive), but whomever provides the many guidelines “wins.”

The highest-scoring possible partner—one with +5 attribute type in most trait categories—is a visual catastrophe.

This individual could be the superb corpse gone completely wrong, a biologically difficult remix of different centuries, events, sexes, dimensions, and capabilities. It is my personal less than delicate method of indicating the best companion we dream about is normally an absurd abstraction. Also someone with the specs we imagine we wish would not be perfect for all of us, because there’s nevertheless really left to visit incorrect (even when dozens of everything is “right”). There’s in addition the lesser technicality that even though we think we understand what we want, we probably don’t. Read more